Oh, thanks, I thought I was going nuts for a second there!
On 24 Feb 2005, at 6:49 pm, Rowan Collins wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:07:57 +1100, David Gerard
What Gerard actually did with the above edit was
take this paragraph:
This is just a non-permanent diff links problem :) The edit in
question was unquestionably vandalism.
The edit you're looking at it is me trying to be helpful; the one
Christiaan posted (or meant to) was a revert of blanking the whole
For future reference, when pointing out vandalism always post:
a) the diff were the vandalism took place; or
b) the version with the vandalism in
because links to "diff between current and last version" change as
soon as there is a different "current" version.
Rowan Collins BSc