There are lots of "unidentified (blah blah)" categories - such as birds,
cars, flowers, and etc etc. How about these categories?
-Yena Hong (Revi)
[[User:-revi]]
-- Sent from Android --
2014. 12. 13. 오후 5:08에 "Andre Engels" <andreengels(a)gmail.xn--com>-4f21ay07k 작성:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, svetlana
<svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au>
wrote:
MZMcBride wrote:
As much as the term is an awful buzzword, Commons
could also do with
additional gamification, from what I've seen. If we can set up an easy
keyword/tagging system, having users help us sort and tag media would be
amazing.
We already have such system. It's called categories. If we would like to
build
a prettier interface for it, I'm all ears (although I wouldn't call
it a game).
Gamification here relates to one type of interface, where a user gets
supplied a random example of an issue, and then tries to resolve that,
with a single resolution being just a small task. For an example of
what that looks like in a Wikimedia- context, see the Wikidata game at
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/. A game could for example be
used to re-categorize files in categories that are too general (like
[[Category:People]]), to categorize uncategorized images or to add a
certain type of category to files where for some reason it seems
likely to apply (for example, images that in some way are described as
paintings which have no author-category).
--
André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>