On 10/09/2007, Axel Boldt <axelboldt(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
I realize that this opt-out procedure is not
perfectly clean from a
legalistic standpoint, but neither is our current distortion of the
GFDL.
In any plausible situation where the GFDL is viewed as valid at all,
this is more "flagrantly wrong" rather than "not perfectly clean".
You
can't simply reappropriate people's intellectual property and declare
that henceforth it will be used in a way they didn't consent to...