On 11 March 2012 11:49, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 March 2012 11:19, Robert Alvarez
<vezbox(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I see at least two current Arbcom members posting
there quite recently and
even responding to requests of banned users to do things on their behalf on
Wikipedia (such as John Vandenberg working for Edward Buckner).
Editing on behalf of banned users used to be a blocking offence.
Presumably this has changed.
To my knowledge, that has always been interpreted to allow editing on
the suggestion of a banned user, but you have to decide for yourself
whether it is a good edit and the responsibility for the edit lies
entirely with you. There is nothing wrong with a banned user pointing
out that there is a spelling mistake in an article and you going and
fixing it.
What is John Vandenberg alleged to have done for Edward Buckner?