Svip wrote:
On 8 May 2010 14:43, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
Well, do you need a picture to explain a dildo?
Well, do you need a picture to explain a cloud?
Do you need a picture to explain a wall? A door? A mobile phone? An
aeroplane? And I could go on, until I would have totally disproved
the usage of Commons following that logic.
So answer me, what does make a picture of a cloud better than a
picture of a dildo? More people have seen a cloud than people who
have seen a dildo.
I totally agree. Even the venerable BBC proudly displayed
a travelling "dildo set" from a century or more back, when
it was auctioned off at a fairly steep price by a premium
auction house, as a valuable collectible. I forget what the
technical term for it was, but it was fairly unpronouceable,
and definitely unspellable (by me at least).
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen