Nikola Smolenski wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 23:03:28 Platonides wrote:
I'm Ccing Wikitech, i suggest we follow this
thread there.
I'm answering on the foundation-l, given that I don't follow wikitech-l, you
do follow foundation-l, and the issues you raise are more community than
software related.
I'm not, and i disagree on that, but if the messages arrive to some of
the other two lists, i'll read them anyway :)
Nikola
Smolenski wrote:
(thread about interwiki bots at toolserver)
Coincidentally, yesterday I released a MediaWiki extension which, if
accepted on Wikimedia projects, may make interwiki bots much less busy.
See
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/A_newer_look_at_the_interwiki_link It also
works by manual writing of the interwikis. I don't think it's
the good way.
*You're not taking into account page moves. What will you do when a page
is moved? (by a low tech user which knows nothing about the global wiki)
I am taking into account page moves. Right now, when a page is moved, if it
has 20 interwiki links, someone has to update 20 pages on 20 Wikipedias. With
the extension, someone has to update a single page on a single wiki -
clearly, something that is easier to do.
But the page has 20 interwikis to the right version. So a
*The articles
will still have a 'preferred' title at the interwiki wiki.
That means discussing about article titles, "Move to English name", "No,
that's not", "Interwikis with pages on Chinese are ugly!"...
I proposed an easy and fair solution: use the name of the page on the first
wiki that covered the topic. If a topic has first been written about on the
Vietnamese Wikipedia, use the Vietnamese name. Either way, redirects work,
and even edit wars of this kind should pose no problem.
I know. But i think avoiding any name is better.
IMHO it should
be a shared table referencing the wiki and page ids.
Then you provide a Special page showing all pages on that group. You'd
reference it as 'include this page into the group XX:sometitle is on'.
You can also provide some space for free-form commenting (such as
explaining the difference with another page).
Obviously, all of that must be properly logged, which with SUL should be
much easier.
Everything that you described already exists, without the special page. The
shared table is the langlinks table on the central wiki; you reference it by
using {{#interlanguage:sometitle}}; free-form commenting is the text on the
central wiki page; it is properly logged in the page history.
Mmm, you're right. I'd prefer using page_ids, but a more db guy than me
should determine the efficiency difference of using ll_title (the page
title) instead. I notice now that ll_title can't hold any wiki title, as
it's a varchar(255) with namespace, while titles are stored varchar(255)
without namespace everywhere else.