On Dec 14, 2007 1:37 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My
question was about Brad's removal as ED, not about his resignation as GC.
Well, that's easy. He was only ever *interim*-ED, it was never
intended to be a long term appointment. It's, therefore, not
surprising that it came to an end.
Well, I guess it's all easy then, since it's not surprising he'd
resign as GC soon after getting removed as ED.
I don't see how that follows. Are you suggesting he was removed from
the ED position against his will? I've seen no evidence of that.