On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:25 AM, David Levy <lifeisunfair(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree. When users edit the wikis to reflect
pro-pedophilia/pro-murder/pro-rape/pro-anything (or anti-anything)
agendas, that's when it's appropriate to act (regardless of whether
they've provided advance indication that such an issue might arise).
I agree.
Ages ago I saw someone editing that believed in child abuse. Their
argument was that there was a historical basis for it, going back to
the Greeks or somesuch.
There wasn't much I could do about it because we're all essentially
just people on the internet, and he wasn't actually saying he had
committed a sex-crime that one could report.
I think this issue is something we don't have to worry about too much.
People like that will be few and far between; if people start
agitating for criminal beliefs I think the community can handle it.
They'll be rightly despised in our community as much as they are in
real life.