In a message dated 11/26/2009 3:39:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
valdelli(a)gmail.com writes:
The final solution is that only people who are already
expert in the
processes can impose their point of view and in fact en.wikipedia
don't assure a neutral point of view but the point of view of expert
users.>>
Exactly the same point I've made a few times. Those who are expert in the
use of the game rules, impose their view on those who are not expert.
Which is why I've suggested the establishment of a group of advocates for
the editor versus the administrators who are viewed as policemen. In a real
society, the only classifications are not "public" and "police". We
also
have checks and balances against the power of the police to force compliance.
In Wikipedia we do not have those checks and balances.
Will