2010/8/24 <wiki-list(a)phizz.demon.co.uk>
Nikola Smolenski wrote:
I wanted to suggest this for a long time. I see two more reasons for
this:
>
> - We are often copying free images or text from various sites (for
> example flickr but other ones too). It happens that these sites go
> offline or change their licenses later. Having such an archive, archived
> by an independent organization, would be indisputable proof of copyright
> status.
The internet archive [...] respects copyright and
robots.txt and applies
the
directives retroactively.
And so does Wikiwix. Wikiwix do respect robots.txt. Linterweb's advocate
certified there is no legal issue with Wikiwix.
Regards, Dodoïste