2010/8/24 wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk
Nikola Smolenski wrote:
I wanted to suggest this for a long time. I see two more reasons for
this:
- We are often copying free images or text from various sites (for
example flickr but other ones too). It happens that these sites go offline or change their licenses later. Having such an archive, archived by an independent organization, would be indisputable proof of copyright status.
The internet archive [...] respects copyright and robots.txt and applies the directives retroactively.
And so does Wikiwix. Wikiwix do respect robots.txt. Linterweb's advocate certified there is no legal issue with Wikiwix.
Regards, Dodoïste