Hoi,
What methods do we have to find community consensus. How is it defined, to
what extend can a single project prevent a resolution to a question. Would
such a position have to be based on arguments or just on say so?
This is yet another situation where a project council would prove to be
invaluable.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jesse Plamondon-Willard <
pathoschild(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Pedro's approach is better:
those users should get right
to delete page (as well to undelete if they make a mistake; or it is
not necessary?), too. Vandals and spammers are making new pages, too
and those pages should be deleted.
I proposed rollback-only because faster reverting probably isn't
controversial, but being able to delete and restore pages on all wikis
(including large wikis like en-Wikipedia) is probably much more
controversial. That's technically possible too, if there is community
consensus to do it.
--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l