Hoi, What methods do we have to find community consensus. How is it defined, to what extend can a single project prevent a resolution to a question. Would such a position have to be based on arguments or just on say so?
This is yet another situation where a project council would prove to be invaluable. Thanks, GerardM
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jesse Plamondon-Willard < pathoschild@gmail.com> wrote:
Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Pedro's approach is better: those users should get right to delete page (as well to undelete if they make a mistake; or it is not necessary?), too. Vandals and spammers are making new pages, too and those pages should be deleted.
I proposed rollback-only because faster reverting probably isn't controversial, but being able to delete and restore pages on all wikis (including large wikis like en-Wikipedia) is probably much more controversial. That's technically possible too, if there is community consensus to do it.
-- Yours cordially, Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l