I want to add a caution about the idea of translating one article for all audiences. Even articles on some plants or animals will contain different information depending on their role in the communities of the speakers of a given language; how much more will articles about some politician or a religious custom vary depending on the presumed cultural context of the community of readers? Even sources vary according to the language of the project, with sources in the project language preferred for ease of verifiability. One of the strengths of multi-language Wikipedia is this very concept of a topic being presented in a fashion that is suitable to different communities of readers, and the language of the text is only one part of that.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:40 AM Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org wrote:
Denny, thanks for writing and rewriting this piece. I finally got a chance to go through it end-to-end. Challenge accepted! :)
Here are a few early thoughts, and I look forward to discussing it with you and others further.
- I tend to agree with you that the challenges of artificial intelligence
are a superset of the challenges of bringing to life the abstract Wikipedia. Quite a few items you list in "Unique advantages" section make the abstract-Wikipedia space more easily approachable.
- I agree with you that if we are to take the content of Wikipedia to many
of the languages spoken in the world today, and engage their speakers to share in, the current model won't work/scale (at least soon enough).
- You've raised a great point about "Graceful degradation". A very nice
challenge.
- In "Unique advantages" you talk about "a single genre of text,
encyclopedias" and I wonder what it takes to expand our thinking to include images as well. Will we need to rethink your current construct? Including images is attractive for at least two reasons: Because in terms of learning people have different needs and we will likely need to (continue to) include images as we create the abstractions, but also because one can potentially think of images as representations that are already abstract.
Best, Leila
-- Leila Zia Senior Research Scientist, Lead Wikimedia Foundation
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Dariusz Jemielniak darekj@alk.edu.pl wrote:
an interesting concept indeed!
dj
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:36 PM Denny Vrandečić <vrandecic@gmail.com mailto:vrandecic@gmail.com> wrote: The extended whitepaper that was presented at the DL workshop is now available here:
http://simia.net/download/abstractwikipedia_whitepaper.pdf
Still not a proper scientific paper (no references, notv situated in related work), but going into a bit more detail on the ideas on the first paper published previously.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018, 11:32 Denny Vrandečić <vrandecic@gmail.commailto: vrandecic@gmail.com wrote:
Semantic Web languages allow to express ontologies and knowledge bases
in
a way meant to be particularly amenable to the Web. Ontologies
formalize
the shared understanding of a domain. But the most expressive and widespread languages that we know of are human natural languages, and
the
largest knowledge base we have is the wealth of text written in human languages.
We looks for a path to bridge the gap between knowledge representation languages such as OWL and human natural languages such as English. We propose a project to simultaneously expose that gap, allow to
collaborate
on closing it, make progress widely visible, and is highly attractive
and
valuable in its own right: a Wikipedia written in an abstract language
to
be rendered into any natural language on request. This would make
current
Wikipedia editors about 100x more productive, and increase the content
of
Wikipedia by 10x. For billions of users this will unlock knowledge they currently do not have access to.
My first talk on this topic will be on October 10, 2018, 16:45-17:00,
at
the Asilomar in Monterey, CA during the Blue Sky track of ISWC. My
second,
longer talk on the topic will be at the DL workshop in Tempe, AZ,
October
27-29. Comments are very welcome as I prepare the slides and the talk.
Link to the paper: http://simia.net/download/abstractwikipedia.pdf
Cheers, Denny
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto: wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
-- ________________________________________________________ [http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/minds.jpg]http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/ prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak kierownik katedry MINDS (Management in Networked and Digital Societies) Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego http://NeRDS.kozminski.edu.pl http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/
Ostatnie artykuły:
- Dariusz Jemielniak, Maciej Wilamowski (2017) Cultural Diversity of
Quality of Information on Wikipedias< http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/cultures%20of%20wikipedias.pdf%3E Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68:
2460–2470.
- Dariusz Jemielniak (2016) Wikimedia Movement Governance: The
Limits
of A-Hierarchical Organization< http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/wikimedia_governance.pdf%3E
Journal
of Organizational Change Management 29: 3. 361-378.
- Dariusz Jemielniak, Eduard Aibar (2016) Bridging the Gap Between
Wikipedia and Academia< http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/bridging.pdf%3E Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67: 7. 1773-1776.
- Dariusz Jemielniak (2016) Breaking the Glass Ceiling on Wikipedia<
http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/glass-ceiling.pdf%3E Feminist Review 113: 1. 103-108.
- Tadeusz Chełkowski, Peter Gloor, Dariusz Jemielniak (2016)
Inequalities in Open Source Software Development: Analysis of
Contributor’s
Commits in Apache Software Foundation Projects<
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.015...
, PLoS ONE 11: 4. e0152976. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe