mboverload wrote:
I messed the last section up: A lazy reporter cites
something from
Wikipedia that is not cited (and maybe not true). The lazy reporter
then reports on it in a reliable source. Then that reliable source
gets cited in the article to back up that "fact".
A reliable source doing that is not reliable anymore, i.e. this source
is not suitable as a reference for Wikipedia.
Well, eh, just my 0.02 €.
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre
http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres