Wikiversity is not the place to try to change or
influence another
Wikimedia project. From what you describe, the Wikiversity project
seems to be opposed to some of the basic premises of Wikipedia.
Perhaps Wikiversity is being used because these ideas wouldn't gain
any currency on Wikipedia or Meta Wikimedia?
Um, duh. Most of the editors participating are banned on en.
That said, if they come up with some good ideas, I will be delighted. Particularly
relating to BLPs, where I feel we have completely lost sight of the principles of guilt
and desert. At the moment on en you can be the biggest spamming dick ever, and no one can
say anything bad about you even at AfD. Which is annoying.
Also, guys, can you apply your brains to our dispute resolution system? It works fine when
both participants are honest and reasonably competent: it works awfully when one is
trolling and gaming the system. We also have no good way to decide definitively "This
is mainstream academic consensus: apply WP:FRINGE and other policies in the light of
this".
Fix all that, and I'll be happy. I might even participate.
Best,
CM
_________________________________________________________________
The John Lewis Clearance - save up to 50% with FREE delivery
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719806/direct/01/