On 9 December 2010 18:54, Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)frontier.com> wrote:
While I understand the challenges in communicating
effectively with a
variety of audiences, I think the point that's been raised is that for a
project that is all about trying to describe things as accurately as
possible, much of the community feels that in order to maintain a basic
level of accuracy, it's worth it to forgo whatever additional money we
might raise by giving it up. To phrase it differently, this is not a
messaging decision that should be left to the outcome of AB testing.
That's an argument to which I'm sympathetic.
That certainly describes my position very well. Thank you.