David Goodman wrote:
I think we will only make progress when we accept the
apologies of the
people involved. I can understand that they want to at least formally
defend the original board statement, but I think they--and we all-
-recognize that the discussion has moved in a somewhat more permissive
direction now than that first statement implied. When people admit
they've acting over-hastily, as by now I think essentially everyone
has, I don't see the point of continue to berate them about it.
We're returning to normalcy. Perhaps the most useful thing people with
any view on the issue could do is contribute to specific discussions
on improvements in how we handle challenges, on possible software
improvements , and on deletion and undeletion of particular images.
Indeed! Moving forward does not depend on determining who was right
about historical wrongs..
Ec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM, K. Peachey
<p858snake(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Stuart West <stuwest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ...snip...
>> Jimmy acknowledged this wasn't right and I respect his apology.
>> ...snip...
>> - stu
>>
> Yes! because no one would consider
> starting discussion on wiki first before drawing their guns and start
> shooting?
>