Mark Williamson wrote:
That's not good enough. First of all, people who
don't speak a
language won't recognize the text "see other languages", or even
"languages". Could you pick the word "ენები" out of a page full of
text in a foreign language and understand that clicking it would lead
you to a link to the English version of an article?
Very well said.
Indeed, the interwiki links are pointedly presented in the relevant
languages/scripts, and the readers for whom they're most useful are
among the least likely to comprehend the label under which they've
been hidden.
The reason your proposal to use geolocation or browser
language is not
good enough is that would still result in reducing the visibility of
many, many Wikipedias. I think there are many users who would prefer
to read articles in Catalan whose default browser language is set to
ES, and geolocation will probably not solve that problem either.
It appears that the idea's ramifications haven't been fully considered
(in part because it's difficult for speakers of one language to
appreciate the needs of another language's speakers).
I think it is a mistake to hide ANY interwikis.
"clutter" is not a
huge sacrifice for people to make to vastly increase INTERNATIONAL
usability.
Furthermore, I don't recall _ever_ encountering a complaint about this
so-called "clutter." But I certainly have seen numerous complaints
about the interwiki links' sudden removal (as many have perceived the
change).
Perhaps a suitable compromise can be devised, but in the meantime, the
only appropriate solution is to display the interwiki links by
default. It's unfortunate that this fix was reverted, let alone in
the name of "usability."
David Levy