Hi Tomasz,
Thank you very much for the information. It is quite unexpected that the
Board of Trustees can't be officially reached in any way, and we have to
try to find our way individually to one and each of the trustees, until one
of them accepts the hot potato in their hands (or not).
I wonder how all this got to this point.
Regards,
Paulo
Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/05/2019 à(s)
17:01:
As far as I know there is no single E-mail address you
can contact Board,
but you can try to catch directly any members of the Board who are still
brave enough to provide their personal E-mail... This is not that
straightforward as you may expect, but first go here:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/
than click on any face you may find especially friendly, and then in some
cases (not in all) by clicking links in their description, with some good
luck you may land on the page, where there is some contact information :-)
Or - much simpler: forget rather useless official WMF website, which is
tailored rather to impress than to provide any information, and go to
meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees
where you can find link to meta-userpages of them and then you can contact
them as usually on wiki.
Good luck,
pon., 6 maj 2019 o 17:09 Paulo Santos Perneta <paulosperneta(a)gmail.com>
napisał(a):
Hello Tomasz,
Thank you for your answer. In the hypothesis of being the Board, how can
one contact it? I do not see any address I could use listed here:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/contact/
I hope at least some of them are reading this mailing list. They can get
back to me, in public or private, and I'll send the case for
investigation.
Regards,
Paulo
Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/05/2019
à(s)
15:57:
> It seems that the only body can help with this is WMF Board od
Trustees,
as
Affcom is the advisory committee of the Board,
and the Board is the top
body legally responsible for the work of entire WMF.
pon., 6 maj 2019 o 15:39 Paulo Santos Perneta <paulosperneta(a)gmail.com
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Cornelius,
> >
> > Apart from the general discussion about the specific role of AffCom,
I
> > really would like to know who is the
entity overseeing the AFfCom, so
> that
> > I can send an official complaint there about what I believe is a
> fraudulent
> > and out of process sanction. This is not a question for the Roles &
> > Responsibilities WG, as The Land has already noted there.
> >
> > Since AffCom is an advisory body to the BoT, it doesn't look as if
the
BoT
> can or should interfere directly on AffCom. But then, who? At the
current
> light, AffCom is looking as a very much
unchecked and extremely
powerful
> entity, taking decisions out of process, in
absolute secrecy, and
issuing
> decrees without following even the most
basic principles of due
process.
> And this is not a theoretical question, it
is a practical one. It
affects
> > directly not only affiliates, but also members of the community not
> > connected to any affiliate, as I had not any connection to any of the
> > affiliates involved in that case.
> >
> > And this is not an isolated case. As I told, the accusations made
last
> year
> > by AffCom against WMPT never were substantiated, and when a lawyer
> finally
> > looked into them, he come out with exactly the same recommendation
and
>
request the chapter made itself to the AffCom, before the whole
situation
> > even started. So what was behind those accusations, back then?
> >
> > It is very easy and comfortable for the WMF/AffCom to blind
everything
with
> the excuse that the evidence is secret, but that is completely out of
> process, and against the most elementary principles of Human Rights.
>
> I want to know who planted this false information at the WMF, and why
it
> > was not checked by the WMF, to the point that a secret sanction
aganitt
me
> come to be in place (since when? till when? no idea).
>
> To who should I complaint about this?
>
> Paulo
>
> Cornelius Kibelka <cornelius.kibelka(a)wikimedia.de> escreveu no dia
> segunda,
> 6/05/2019 à(s) 14:14:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think these are good and relevant questions, but I'd suggest you
keep
the
> discussion where it's best placed – on the talk page of the Roles &
> Responsibility scoping document talk page:
>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/20…
>
>
> > Paulo has already started a discussion over there. Kirill, it would
be
> > > great if you could add your opinion and experience there as well.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Cornelius
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 15:11, Kiril Simeonovski <
> > > kiril.simeonovski(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > P.S. I would also like to add the other committees in the
movement
> such
> > > > like the grantmaking committees. My first go would be the Board
of
> >
Trustees
> > > but it is better to see if someone who knows exactly can provide
more
> > > > details.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Kiril
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:03 PM Kiril Simeonovski <
> > > > kiril.simeonovski(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Paulo,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an excellent question. I am curious to find out that
too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Kiril
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:13 PM Paulo Santos Perneta <
> > > > > paulosperneta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Actually, I'm not familiar with this specific situation
as
well,
> > apart
> > > > >> from
> > > > >> having been informed by my affiliate that WMF had informed
it
I
was
> > under
> > >> some sanction that probably I was unaware of, related to
affiliates
> I
> > > was
> > > >> not part of and episotes I do not took part.
> > > >>
> > > >> This is an outraging, appalling and unbelievable behavior from
the
> > > > >> Wikimedia Foundation in general, and AffCom in particular.
I
> really
> > > > would
> > > > >> like to get to the bottom of this, and more than have it
> reverted, I
> > > > >> actually want to know who planted the false information
about
me
>
there
> > > >> which led to this situation.
> > > >>
> > > >> I hope there is some way to effectively and officially demand
and
> > > internal
> > > >> inquiry inside the Wikimedia Foundation over this situation.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Paulo
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Benjamin Ikuta <benjaminikuta(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia
segunda,
> > > >> 6/05/2019
> > > >> à(s) 10:20:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm not familiar with this specific situation, but I
agree
that
> more
> > > >> > transparency and accountability would be good.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On May 6, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta <
> > > >> paulosperneta(a)gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hello,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > A few days ago the Wikimedia affiliate I belong to was
> officially
> > > >> > informed,
> > > >> > > by a WMF source, that I'm being subject to a until
now
unknown
> > > >> sanction,
> > > >> > > with an accusation from AffCom I can only describe as
baseless
> and
> > > >> > > fraudulent, relating to a a situation between two
affiliates,
> > > dealt
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > by
> > > > >> > > AffCom more than one year ago, of which I was
never part
of,
> >
> occurred
> > > >> > more
> > > >> > > than one year ago. I was never informed of this.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > This is not the first time AffCom engages in this sort
of
> > appalling
> > > >> > > behavior. As far as I know, WMPT is still waiting for
the
> > > accusations
> > > >> > made
> > > >> > > by AffCom last year, which led to its suspension, to
be
> > > substantiated.
> > > >> > > AffCom never substantiated anything related to that,
with
the
> > > excuse
> > > > >> of a
> > > > >> > > need for secrecy.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > How, I ask you all as members of the Movement, how
come
the
> > > > Wikimedia
> > > > >> > > Movement allowed for such a secretive, arbitrary,
apparently
> > > > unchecked
> > > > >> > and
> > > > >> > > very much powerful institution to grow and thrive
like
this
in
> its
> > > >> > middle,
> > > >> > > overseeing and effectively controlling the relation of
all
of
> us
> > > > (both
> > > > >> > > affiliates and individuals) and the WMF?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > More important than that, what can be done about
this?
Where
one
> > can
> > > >> > appeal
> > > >> > > to, when presented with such fraudulent, baseless,
secretive,
> > > > >> > > unsubstantiated accusations by a body which was
supposed
to
be
> > above
> > > >> all
> > > >> > > suspicion?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Can an internal inquiry be demanded somewhere at the
Wikimedia
> > > > >> Foundation
> > > > >> > > over the activities and decisions of AffCom, in
the same
way
> we
> > do
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > > suspicious activity by checkusers and supervisors,
with
the
> > > > Ombudsman
> > > > >> > > Commission?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Looking forward for any help and insight on this,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Paulo - DarwIn
> > > > >> > > Wikimedia Portugal
> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > >> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > >> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > >> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > >> > > Unsubscribe:
> > > >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > > > >> ,
> > > > >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > >> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > >> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > >> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > >> > Unsubscribe:
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > ,
> > >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > >>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > >>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > >> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ,
> > >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cornelius Kibelka
> > Internationale Beziehungen | International Relations
> > Vorstandsteam | Office of the ED
> >
> > Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
> > Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
> >
http://wikimedia.de
> >
> > Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge
allen
> > > Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
> > >
http://spenden.wikimedia.de/
> > >
> > > Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens
e.
V.
> > > Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts
Berlin-Charlottenburg
>
unter
> > der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt
für
> > Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer
27/029/42207
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>