On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jussi-Ville
Heiskanen
<cimonavaro(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>
>> Surely there is a significant difference between an updated version of
>>
> the
>
>> same license, and a license which says the work can be relicensed under
a
different license.
Define "same license". It really seems to me you want to
define a license as being different if it changes something
you don't like.
In this context, for a license to be the "same license" as the GFDL, it
would need to be called "GFDL X.Y" and be published by the FSF.
I think that says it all. If that is what you really want,
good day to you, sir.
If you included the context in which I used the phrase you would see that I
wasn't describing what I really want, but was responding to a point about
precedent.