On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Russavia <russavia.wikipedia(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
And he's not the only Wikimedia admin to
participate on WO incognito.
in itself is food for thought.
And therein lies the problem.
In 28byte's case he actively attacked myself and another editor on WO
forums on an issue in which I wasn't involved, and then proceded to
close an AfD as if he was an uninvolved admin/bureaucrat.
28bytes is as a dishonest person who you will ever come across, and he
"outed" himself only after seeing the "secret" subforum where he saw
he was going to be outed by you guys.
And you want to hold him as an example of a shining example of WO
Personally, I'd much rather any admins, bureaucrats and checkusers who have
active accounts on WO would be open about their WP user names.
This doesn't change the fact, does it, that David's description of 28bytes
as a "troll", and presumably one of the "justifiably-banned users",
ludicrously at variance with the facts. 28bytes is trusted with more
permissions on the English Wikipedia than David is.