-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote:
I was rummaging for story about Samuel Johnson and
people hunting for
naughty words in his dictionary, when I came across a Google Books
reproduction of an 1896 periodical titled "The Homiletic Review", edited
by I.K. Funk, of Funk and Wagnalls. It appears that a competitor to
their dictionary culled the naughtiest bits from the Funk & Wagnalls
Standard Dictionary, used those to claim they were filth-mongers, and
set out to create a giant hullabaloo.
Thank you so much for this historical perspective. It is indeed
interesting to watch history repeat itself. I didn't know about this
particular case before. I can only hope the Wiktionary communities have
learned their history better than some others; otherwise perhaps they'll
be next on the chopping block!
- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvsOnwACgkQst0AR/DaKHvFWwCgqemiuyU0eWWUBY259z7e736U
vdEAoKgChs+I1Q2EvSP+myqzZKm/IvYc
=rWEw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----