On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Joseph Chirum <sundog358(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
If it were Art, the copyright would be clearly
defined. If it is technical craft in the medical field, such images fall unto another
category all together. Any display of such images would need the patient consent to be
HIPPA compliant, or other agreement binding.
It's just not that simple, unfortunately. HIPAA applies to personally
identifying information; I think it'd be easy to argue that the
presumption on imagery, devoid of identifying accompanying text, is
that it is de facto de-identified and thus exempt from HIPAA scrutiny.