Hoi,
As I recall it there is a category with Russian female painters.. Using
"Widar" [1] and identifying them as a painter and a female takes all of 5
minutes..
Thanks,
GerardM
[1]
Magnus, you are magical as always, thanks!
What an odd list though - who has been working so diligently on
Russian paintresses? Whoever you are, great work!
meanwhile, sending more virtual kudos to Magnus while I dig into these
results,
Jane
2014/1/24, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>om>:
A list of female painters with no article on
en.wp:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim%5B106%3A102818…
(might take a few seconds to load)
Cheers,
Magnus
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jane Darnell <jane023(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I
have been generating
some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about
Art & Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I
could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects.
With Reasonator I see 503 female persons and 760 male persons. Not
very helpful (yet) for generating red-link lists.
2014/1/23, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett
<andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
wrote:
>
>> On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box
> would
> >> be
> >> > the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on
wikidata
> >> > information, which they could
technically already do, all we'd have
> >> > to
> >> > do
> >> > is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with
the
> >> > wikidata information. In light
of that, writing code to fill an
> infobox
> >> > with values form wikidata to paste into the article seems ...
> >> > low-tech
> >> ;-)
> >>
> >> Indeed - but we have to work with what we have.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we could concentrate on one very narrow subject, and its
> >> single corresponding infobox, as a pilot?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I suggest that this discussion should be on the various projects that
> might
> > be affected, particularly as different projects have very different
> > ideas
> > about whether the use of Wikidata for anything more than language
links
> is
> > acceptable. Many projects do not permit bulk bot creation of content,
> > and
> > this proposal is a close parallel.
> >
> > Further, content that isn't editable on the project on which it is
> > hosted
> > is probably not a very effective way to persuade people to turn it
into
> an
> > actual page.
> >
> > Trialing the process on some small projects that actively volunteer to
> > participate would be a first step.
> >
> > Risker/Anne
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
undefined
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>