Exactly. No matter how much a language is supported, universal
bilingualism generally results in language shift.
If 20% of a society remains monolingual, that may be sufficient to
ensure that the other 80% remains bilingual, depending on the social
position of that 20% and how they are distributed geographically.
Language shift is something that can be observed in many countries -
Bhutan is seeing many of its children failing Dzongkha classes and
preferring English consistently, for example, despite the official
support given to the language.
As long as Wales is part of the United Kingdom, maintaining a
bilingual population will be a challenge.
Mark
On 29/01/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 29/01/2008, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 29/01/2008, Mark Williamson
<node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To some extent. However, long-term maintenance of
bilingualism at all
levels of a society is rare, and in those situations where it can be
found, one language can still be said to be "dying", for example Welsh
and English.
I'd certainly disagree in the case of Welsh. The official promotion of
it in schools means a generation of Welsh kids is growing up speaking
it as well as they do English.
And yet despite the amounts spent most well default to English. Remove
the props and welsh would have only very limited use within a couple
of decades.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.