People and/or folks :)
Would you (several of you, starting from Milos) please, OH
please stop playing with me in 'Straw man'
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man) game!!!
But still there is no really reason to think think we
don't have
plenty youngsters able to write science and technology articles.
Did I say (or at least hint?) that there is no such youngsters???
It seems that it's high time to recollect backbone of arguing between
me and Milos:
1) Milos said - let's focus our 'recruitment' only on people within
15-24 years age limits.
2) I objected that our effort should be limited by so tight limits,
but I never (Never, NEVER) objected that people of 15-24 age are of
significant interest to recruitment (better to say *evengelisation*)
process.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM, geni<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/7/25 Pavlo Shevelo
<pavlo.shevelo(a)gmail.com>om>:
Stewardship is (I'm simplifying) top level of
adminship (sysopship).
So if we have 16 year old addmin (sysop) so it 's not big surprise to
see 19-year old steward.
... but what about articles on nuclear phisics or same
scientific/technology topic written by 19 year old guy/lady? ...
FA-grade articles if any?
Sure. The 19 has a reasonable chance of being at a university that
means they have access to reliant journals and at least some free
time.
... and let's discuss not exceptions but...
mainstream.
Then why are you talking about FAs? The mainstream are not FAs.
But still there is no really reason to think think we don't have
plenty youngsters able to write science and technology articles.
While people keep pretty quiet about ages on en I've certainly run
across people at university or younger who work in those areas.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l