Op 2013/08/05 23:44, MZMcBride schreef:
This leaves us to consider the biggest question:
opt-in vs. opt-out.
Erik and James are both quite smart, they are true Wikimedians, and
they make reasonable points about choosing opt-out over opt-in.
This is the point
on which we fundamentally disagree. Their argument for
'opt-out' is based solely upon the quality and quantity of testing that
it affords to VE. VE is not a mission-critical feature: while we have
concerns about Wikipedia's sustainability, there's no question that it
has survived for years and will survive for years more. The stability of
the site is much more important than testing this code, and the testing
strategy of presenting it as if it was functioning software and seeing
what people did with it wasn't a reasonable decision: it was completely
and absolutely irresponsible.
KWW