That is what I thought, actually. Even so, still probably not
appropriate for a public Wikimedia list.
Nathan
On Jan 9, 2008 6:34 PM, Austin Hair <adhair(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 4:28 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Greg is
telling "foundation" people that they need to
be transparent with "wiki" people no matter how
expensive because "wiki" is the means of the
"foundation". Erik replies that his first method of
promoting transparency to these people is to promote
more of them to volunteer in these issues rather than
just comment. Meanwhile, in the ru.WB thread, a
"wiki" person explains why he finds "foundation"
people to be pesky salesman that would do better to
spend their time on wiki work.
I wouldn't read too much into the ravings of a rogue admin - I don't
think his views are particularly representative of any significant
portion of the community.
This kind of talk isn't at all appropriate. Please keep a civil
tongue when discussing issues on any Wikimedia mailing list.
Austin
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l