Kul Takanao Wadhwa HYPERLINK
"mailto:foundation-l%40lists.wikimedia.org?Subject=%5BFoundation-l%5D%20Fund
raising%20%26%20Networking%20updates&In-Reply-To=6hfmtm%242mbrsq%40smtp06.sy
d.iprimus.net.au"kwadhwa at
wikimedia.org
Wed Jan 23 20:50:27 UTC 2008
Simon,
There are a lot of issues we need to examine here (including carefully
analyzing what we have doing up to this point) but I appreciate the
input. Believe me, we are going to take a look and investigate all
the possibilities here. Please keep the comments coming...thanks.
--Kul
>> Analyzing? I imagine that’s an understatement.
Congrats to you and Jay.
I wish I was a fly on the wall, the possibilities being so
endless. I can
imagine it’s a very different culture from where you’ve come from; the idea
of this well attended feedback thread being a revelation for most non
profits. The transparency is great, but all subjects on one thread is
insane, and impossible to follow for us slow learners, as I’ve said earlier
(if you could find it). HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-January/038027.html"
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-January/038027.html
I’ve just been wrapped on the knuckles for not keeping up.
So in the interests of keeping Transparency with a big T and saving our
eyes, could I ask that you set up a forum on wikback. I know it’s new but so
are you, I and Jay. It would be nice to take a methodical approach and save
answering the same questions about the issues. Could I also ask that yo
might set up a page (say Revenue opportunities) on meta and link directly to
the thread where discussion about its subjective issues takes place. I think
you’ll find if we use this model then its utility will begin to be seen
across the wikiuniverse, and conjure a new revenue stream which may be
acceptable to the WMF’s global communities.
The main point is that we now have to deal with global groups and share
their learning in real time as opposed to making decisions internally in a
head office and expecting everyone to suddenly change their behaviour when
an announcement is made. E.g, I feel for Erik when all he’s trying to do is
get video into the wiki media mix, and the purists want to flog him as much
as they do themselves. It’s the journey not the arrival, although in
monetary terms taking this approach may speed things up.
I take it you’ve gone through the obvious things like “powered by xxx” on
every page, etc. But if we could go through the possibilities in an orderly
fashion in a forum, at least we won’t have to explain why a decision has
been made. In general terms of course; we all know the inexperienced won’t
appreciate (or want to know) the finer points of building personal
relationships.
The main issue, so far as I can see (as I’ve said on that link above), is to
decide whether Foundation members prefer to take money from the public purse
or private purses. Each requires a very different strategy and will have
different outcomes. But this is not the place for discussion, so let me wish
you all the best and go now. Regards, simon
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1241 - Release Date: 24/01/2008
9:58 AM