On 23 May 2010 18:03, Pharos pharosofalexandria@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Philippe Beaudette pbeaudette@wikimedia.org wrote:
tbh, I'm very fond of "Double check". It seems to imply exactly what we want: the edit isn't being accepted automatically, nor rejected, but simply getting a second look. It's fairly neutral in tone, and understandable to the average person.
I agree. Simple words are good.
Thanks, Richard (User:Pharos)
+1 -Liam
wittylama.com/blog Peace, love & metadata
Philippe (speaking in my capacity as a volunteer, and not as an employee of the Foundation)