would that become Wikimedia Uncommons or Unwikimedia Commons? Or do we
avoid this question by leaving it to an outside party?
Lodewijk
(who is btw not so much charmed of an uncommons at all)
2014-06-17 21:06 GMT+02:00 Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:19 PM, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
the project and world benefit from [Commons]
existing as is. But we
need an
alternative to support the educational mission,
reasonable inter-project
reuse,
and end the endless deletion wars.
Yes, this. With highly visible guidance for licensing/use.
Uncommons is a charming name.
SJ
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>