We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other
point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is
done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
On 9 February 2012 04:34, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Oliver Keyes
<okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea
how we can test this
without full deployment, please, go ahead.
feedback was sent to contributors?
did the contributor make use of the feedback?
if not, why not?
On the second, it should scale;
we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages)
I'm not talking about server scalability. im suggesting that you dont
know whether the community can use the feedback effectively without
answering the first question.
"Improve this page" is unfounded until there is evidence that the
feedback *will* be used by the community.
p.s. it should be "Improve this article"
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation