We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
On 9 February 2012 04:34, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this without full deployment, please, go ahead.
feedback was sent to contributors? did the contributor make use of the feedback? if not, why not?
On the second, it should scale; we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages)
I'm not talking about server scalability. im suggesting that you dont know whether the community can use the feedback effectively without answering the first question.
"Improve this page" is unfounded until there is evidence that the feedback *will* be used by the community.
p.s. it should be "Improve this article"
-- John Vandenberg
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l