--- Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net wrote:
Hello,
Birgitte SB wrote:
As I said before [1], stewards should be allowed
to
opt-in the wiki's with no community. Disscussions only need to happen if there is an active
community.
I also don't mind opt-out if everyone gets comprehensible notification about the system and
how
to opt-out.
If the stewards would be able to decide themselves to opt-in a wiki without community approval, then this is quite the same as the opt-out proposal by Lodewijk.
IMHO, when this system is technically ready, there should be a discussion in each wiki which has a community, at least to inform the wiki that
- the new feature exists,
- the wiki has the choice to opt-in or -out.
Now if no community is able to take such a decision, and the stewards take it for them, your proposition is quite the same as Lodewijk's. It only gives more power to stewards, which they should not have.
Regards,
Yann
Trusting the stewards to opt-in what they judge to be a wiki with no community and taking this feature live on all wikis at once is not the same proposal. Both proposals make dealing with vandalism on inactive wikis easier, but my proposal prevents the problems that might occur with more active wikis due to poor communication.
Birgitte SB
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs