Hello,
Birgitte SB wrote:
As I said before [1], stewards should be allowed
to
opt-in the wiki's with no community.
Disscussions
only need to happen if there is an active
community.
I also don't mind opt-out if everyone gets
comprehensible notification about the system and
how
to opt-out.
If the stewards would be able to decide themselves
to opt-in a wiki
without community approval, then this is quite the
same as the opt-out
proposal by Lodewijk.
IMHO, when this system is technically ready, there
should be a
discussion in each wiki which has a community, at
least to inform the
wiki that
1. the new feature exists,
2. the wiki has the choice to opt-in or -out.
Now if no community is able to take such a decision,
and the stewards
take it for them, your proposition is quite the same
as Lodewijk's. It
only gives more power to stewards, which they should
not have.
Regards,
Yann
Trusting the stewards to opt-in what they judge to be
a wiki with no community and taking this feature live
on all wikis at once is not the same proposal. Both
proposals make dealing with vandalism on inactive
wikis easier, but my proposal prevents the problems
that might occur with more active wikis due to poor
communication.
Birgitte SB
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.