Recently I had a conversation with a fawiki friend
and asked if fawiki
have any problem about hosting those images on their article. First he
seemed to be very surprised to know fawiki hosted "Muhammad's images".
After giving a glance, he got his calmness again and said they were
not "depicting Muhammad" and Muslims know that. There are rather
products of imagination by each artists. So they are okay. And
interestingly I haven't heard anyone complaints about fawiki hostings.
What other kinds of images of Muhammad are there? There are no
contemporary portraits, so they're all products of imaginations of
artists...