Coren / Marc (cc'ing to your personal email as well)
Odder's blog post was posted 3 weeks ago, and my analysis was posted 24
hours ago, and many English Wikipedia admins have said they have seen
either and/or both.
It's already been established that there is massive copyvio in there, and I
think it is absolutely unacceptable for a copyvio to still be in this
article under the circumstances.
Could you please be so kind as to:
1) Revert the article back to
2) Revdel all edits going back to
ensure that the copyright violation is hidden from public view as is
3) Perhaps you could leave a message on the article talk page, and perhaps
also leave messages at
them that this article which is rated as top importance for 2 of
these projects have had to be revdelled back to November 2012 (a year and a
half) and that they may wish to work on the article given the circumstances.
I have more examples of copyvios as well, so if you like I would be happy
to send them through to you for you to action. Would that be ok with you?