So, I think that such a project works well with the concept of NPOV. I think
you can break the site into two distinct parts.
Part 1: You collect opinions of various sorts in various ways.
Part 2: You organize them in terms of their relative significance to each
other and summarize them in a disinterested voice.
This would be a lot like Wikibooks and Wikipedia; people write stuff on
Wikibooks and then people cite those books on Wikipedia.
-Josh
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sage Ross wrote:
I think this is an excellent, long overdue idea
and something
Wikimedia should be interested in. I was actually thinking of
proposing something like this at
strategy.wikimedia.org (and may still
do so).
I don't think that creating such a project within Wikimedia would be a
great idea. NPOV is one of the most important Wikimedia principles.
--vvv
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
I am running the Arizona Rock'n'Roll marathon with Team in Training. Help me
reach my fundraising goals:
http://pages.teamintraining.org/ma/pfchangs10/joshuagay