Fæ, Surely no grant-giving body would even talk to the Foundation if it
could not show them a plan for the medium to long term. For some reason,
the Foundation is consistently unwilling to share this plan with the
Community (its biggest donor in terms both of money and surplus value). I
wonder why that would be?
"Rogol"
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No need, it's on webarchive:
http://web.archive.org/web/20170112103412/https://upload.
wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/d/dd/Education_and_WGIG.pdf
Unlike Wikimedia projects, Webarchive has a long term plan that one
would expect of a digital archive, so it's a much safer space for
historical documents.
I stopped asking about an equivalent realistic Wikimedia 100 year plan
a couple of years back. The $100m endowment thingy controlled by Jimmy
does not have this as a goal either, as far as I can tell.
Fae
On 12 January 2017 at 00:41, Newyorkbrad <newyorkbrad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If it is decided not to host these materials on a
wiki, whether for
copyright or any other reasons, then someone (either in the Office or
a volunteer) should be designated to retain a copy privately. That
way, he or she will be able to upload it later if the copyright status
or policy changes in the future, or to make it available offline for
research use or consultation by historians or other researchers who
could make good use of it.
Newyorkbrad/IBM
On 1/11/17, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for bringing this up, Yann. Some relevant context is that Meta
> Wiki users considered permitting such files on Meta Wiki a year and a
half
> ago, and decided not to. The electorate was
not very big (14 votes,
total),
> but it was carefully considered, with
compelling arguments made on both
> sides.[1]
>
> In my opinion, the best outcome would be that Meta Wiki should have an
> Exemption Doctrine Policy (the board's name for a project's local policy
> that would permit copyrighted files under specific circumstances)[2] I
> think the Meta Wiki decision should be revisited and considered in more
> depth, with more participation, and probably reversed (with some careful
> work on defining the proper circumstances for an exemption).
>
> But of course, that's not an easy task. I have no ready answer, but am
> interested to see what ideas others have.
> -Pete
> [[User:Peteforsyth]]
>
> [1]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Babel&
diff=prev&oldid=13362698#General_discussion_on_allowing_or_rejecting_fair_
use_at_Meta
> [2]
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Yann Forget <yannfo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to get more opinions about what to do with files such as
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Education_and_WGIG.pdf
>>
>> This is a draft from a United Nations conference which mentions
Wikipedia
>> (the first and only AFAIK), and as such,
an important historical
document.
>>
>> It doesn't have a formal license, but there is no real copyright issue.
>>
>> Where and how should we keep such files?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Yann Forget
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>