Erik Moeller wrote:
These are at least two important statements to have on the record, so thanks for that, in spite of the fact that you ignored all my other points. Why "by the end of this year" and not "within the next couple of months"?
To give time in case the process takes longer than we would like. I see no reason to publicly commit to a timetable when I am not sure. Under promise, over deliver.
What is it that makes these decisions so complex and hard to take?
The composition of the board is of critical importance to insuring that our core mission and community values are respected. A healthy discussion in the community takes time. Recruitment of board members, assessing our needs, interviewing candidates, all of these things take time. A wrong decision could be disastrous, as the board is the ultimate legal authority. I make no apologies for moving cautiously and with great thought, because I think that transitioning us from a tiny club into a large organization is my highest responsibility to us all.
And when it comes to inviting an outside member, how is that member going to be chosen? Will there be a public dialogue about who the best figure is for this role, or will they simply be appointed?
It would be absolutely fine to start a public dialogue about it right now. Who do you recommend we approach?
--Jimbo