In a message dated 11/30/2005 7:09:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,
chris(a)starglade.org writes:
I wasn't talking about the article in question, I was talking in general
about the kinds of pages on my watchlist where this happens (which are
mainly politics/philosophy-related). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Chris
I still contend that we should not just be randomly removing material that
isnt sourced. We should not be working on the assumption that the material is
inaccurate. Rather than removing material, ask for sources or find people to
help source it. I want us to start with the assumption that the material is
good, unless proven otherwise, not that it is bad, unless proven good. Just
removing people's good-faith edits is not improving wikipedia either.
Danny