Hello,
I am not quite sure what will be the future of the "Movement partners". I
can imagine that a museum (for example) can be a partner in an initiative
set up by the WMF, a chapter or a thorg.
WMNL and Teylers Museum together started the "Teylers Challenge", a edit
competition. The museum could use the logo on its site, as a part of the
joint initiative. When such an initiative is over, its over, so simple is
it.
But maybe I did not fully understand the concept of the Movement partners.
Kind regards
Ziko
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter
http://wikimedia.nl
Wikimedia Nederland
Postbus 167
3500 AD Utrecht
-----------------------------------------------------------
2013/4/29 Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>
On 4/29/13 1:03 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium meeting:
what's the current status of the 'movement partners' affiliation?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_**
models/Movement_Partners<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affili…
Is recognition of movement partners something that AffComm will be taking
on in future, or will it rest with WMF/Chapters for now? Not sure what the
latest discussions have been.
thanks!
Phoebe
That's a great question, and one the Open Knowledge Foundation was
scratching its head about a few months back! I'd love to see this open up
again, especially for OpenGLAM and GLAM-Wiki programs and initiatives.
-Sarah
--
*Sarah Stierch*
*/Museumist and open culture advocate/*
>Visit
sarahstierch.com
<http://sarahstierch.com><<
______________________________**_________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.**org <Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists…