Hello,
I am not quite sure what will be the future of the "Movement partners". I can imagine that a museum (for example) can be a partner in an initiative set up by the WMF, a chapter or a thorg. WMNL and Teylers Museum together started the "Teylers Challenge", a edit competition. The museum could use the logo on its site, as a part of the joint initiative. When such an initiative is over, its over, so simple is it. But maybe I did not fully understand the concept of the Movement partners. Kind regards Ziko
----------------------------------------------------------- Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter http://wikimedia.nl
Wikimedia Nederland Postbus 167 3500 AD Utrecht -----------------------------------------------------------
2013/4/29 Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com
On 4/29/13 1:03 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium meeting: what's the current status of the 'movement partners' affiliation? http://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_** models/Movement_Partnershttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Movement_Partners
Is recognition of movement partners something that AffComm will be taking on in future, or will it rest with WMF/Chapters for now? Not sure what the latest discussions have been.
thanks! Phoebe
That's a great question, and one the Open Knowledge Foundation was scratching its head about a few months back! I'd love to see this open up again, especially for OpenGLAM and GLAM-Wiki programs and initiatives. -Sarah
-- *Sarah Stierch* */Museumist and open culture advocate/*
Visit sarahstierch.com http://sarahstierch.com<<
______________________________**_________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l