--- Brion Vibber <brion(a)pobox.com> wrote:
If we're going to try hiding things,
* What are we hiding, from whom?
* How much do we trust them?
* Do we trust them enough not to peek?
* If we don't trust them, why are they there?
* If we do trust them, why are we hiding information?
If the only requirement is to protect against casual reading of pages by
highly-trusted individuals in another workgroup, maybe it's good enough. But do
we need it then?
All the right questions. All we need to do is properly vette those people who are given
access to
InternalWiki. We could given make each promise to keep what they see there secret. But if
we can't
trust committee members in one committee with information generated from another, then
they should
not be a member of *any* committee.
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com