This was brought up during the 4.0 drafting process, but it was ultimately rejected:
https://creativecommons.org/2012/08/29/ongoing-discussions-noncommercial-and...
We also proposed renaming NC to "Commercial Rights Reserved" to make it clearer what NC does, but that too had insufficient support.
https://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/2012-December/008087.html
I'm not sure what the current attitudes are at CC but I think it's no more likely than before.
-Kat
Is there any way we could convince CC to deprecate the useless -NC licenses?
Thanks, Mike
On 11 Jul 2020, at 22:59, Erik Moeller eloquence@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Pete Forsyth wrote a new essay on the ambiguities of the NonCommercial ("non-commercial use only") provision in Creative Commons licenses, which I wanted to share in case it's helpful for folks making the case against using NC to cultural institutions or others (or in the occasionally resurgent debate to permit NC within Wikimedia):
https://freedomdefined.org/The_non-commercial_provision_obfuscates_intent
It argues that NC is so ambiguous in its defining restriction that it almost defeats the point of attaching a CC license at all. I feel this complements the longer (dated!) essay at https://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC nicely.
Warmly,
Erik
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe