On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 08:09:34PM +1000, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Kim Bruning
<kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 03:58:10PM +1000, John
Vandenberg wrote:
Instead of deleting pornographic content that we
deem "important" to
the projects, we can tag those images in a uniform manner and emit
POWDER ICRA labelling[1] or similar. ?The filters can then scale with
us.
Shall we also make similar proposals favoring the governments of China and Iran re
political or religeous content?
No, I don't beat my wife; thanks for asking. :P
Sorry, I didn't mean to ask that ;-)
[[Internet Content Rating Association]]
"The descriptive vocabulary was drawn up by an international panel and
designed to be as neutral and objective as possible."
Ok, so if you want to do censorship, that would be the cleanest possible
way to do so.
We already do what we can to help Muslims censor themselves.
See [[Talk:Muhammad]], faq 4.
Dang.
All this censorship makes me feel a lot dirtier than the "smut" it is
censoring. <sigh>
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (
www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72