Hi Anne,
it was however common procedure to ask publicly for applications before
making a decision on who are the best candidates. Maybe they are the best
there are - maybe not, we'll never know.
As an unrelated sidenote, I still hope the committee will public an annual
report of her activities in summary (as I suggested a few members
privately).
Best,
Lodewijk
El 22 de abril de 2012 21:46, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> escribió:
Without commenting on the quality of the work of the
Ombudsmen, I'll just
point out that there has never been a vote for this position.
Risker/Anne
On 22 April 2012 15:43, Etienne Beaule <betienne(a)bellaliant.net> wrote:
Still, a vote for new members should of been
done.
Ebe123
On 12-04-22 4:29 PM, "Richard Symonds" <richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
I suspect it's because they're doing a
good job in the WMFs opinion, at
least, that's how I read it in Philippe's email...
Richard
On Apr 22, 2012 4:11 AM, "Béria Lima" <berialima(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you request another year from them instead of
running
> a new process, Philippe?
> _____
> *Béria Lima*
>
> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
> construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
>
>
> On 21 April 2012 22:06, Philippe Beaudette <philippe(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>>
>>> A sign of a healthy committee is that it does its work promptly and
>>> undramatically. The ombudsman commission is such a committee.
Charged
>>
with investigating alleged privacy violations around the checkuser
tool,
>>> the commission has functioned with a high degree of professionalism
and
>>
efficiency. The commission is appointed under the auspices of the
Board,
>>> who have delegated this role to the staff - first to Cary, and then I
>> took
>>> it on.
>>>
>>> Accordingly, after a great bit of deliberation, I offered the
ombudsmen
>> the
>>> ability to extend their current term for one additional year. All,
with
>> the
>>> exception of one, have chosen to do so. The one who has not is
Pundit,
>> who
>>> has accepted a position as a steward. Dweller, who was an advisory
>> member
>>> of the commission, takes Pundit's seat.
>>>
>>> It should be noted that this was done some time ago - I have been
>> extremely
>>> remiss in sending out the notification. There was no lapse of
>> commission,
>>> and the commission functioned fully during the gap period.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> pb
>>> ___________________
>>> Philippe Beaudette
>>> Director, Community Advocacy
>>> Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
>>>
>>> 415-839-6885, x 6643
>>>
>>> philippe(a)wikimedia.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l