David Goodman wrote:
Libelous content is one thing; but as for
"vile" -- there are a lot
of vile things and people in the world, and we need to cover them
objectively. Is it being seriously suggested the foundation intends to
remove sourced negative content depicting evil aspects fairly and
frankly when appropriate to an article? Or articles about people
that when written fairly inherently contain sourced strongly negative
content?
I know of no one who has proposed any such thing.