2009/9/15 Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>rg>:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Hay (Husky)
<huskyr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
with its 255 pages
this might be something that you would rather like to skim through
instead of fully read :)
Anything to disrupt my view that the NC licenses suck because it's unclear
what they mean?
Not a view I disagree with, personally!
One interesting example the blog post brings up - a
nonprofit-with-ads, paying for hosting costs that way, is that
commercial? 60% of creators say it is non-commercial, whilst *70%* of
reusers think so - which really does begin to sound like a recipe for
unintentionally annoying a lot of people releasing material under the
license.
I wonder, perhaps, if the best thing the next generation of the -nc-
licenses could include would be a long list of worked examples...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk