2009/9/15 Anthony wikimail@inbox.org:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Hay (Husky) huskyr@gmail.com wrote:
with its 255 pages this might be something that you would rather like to skim through instead of fully read :)
Anything to disrupt my view that the NC licenses suck because it's unclear what they mean?
Not a view I disagree with, personally!
One interesting example the blog post brings up - a nonprofit-with-ads, paying for hosting costs that way, is that commercial? 60% of creators say it is non-commercial, whilst *70%* of reusers think so - which really does begin to sound like a recipe for unintentionally annoying a lot of people releasing material under the license.
I wonder, perhaps, if the best thing the next generation of the -nc- licenses could include would be a long list of worked examples...