Except that this time they don't "hope that all of you will be a part of
this next step in our evolution", since Wikimedia community input ceases
around 15 September in what has been constantly defined as a very
preliminary draft, with very low to null engagement from the WGs, and next
time we'll see that, it will be already the finished product under
deployment.
Not good.
Paulo
Jeff Hawke <geoffey.hawke(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 23/08/2019 à(s)
11:40:
Paulo,
You suggest that "things will not get pretty if the Wikimedia community
does not approve some of the recommendations". You may recall that just
five years ago, Jan-Bart de Vreede, then chair of the WMF Board, expressed
the opinion
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LilaTretikov_(WMF)&a…
over
a much less dramatic change.
All of this is going to require change, change
that might not be
acceptable to some of you. I hope that all of you will be a part
of this
next step in our evolution. But I understand that if you decide to take a
wiki-break, that might be the way things have to be. Even so, you have to
let the Foundation do its work and allow us all to take that next step when
needed. I can only hope that your break is temporary, and that you will
return when the time is right.
I presume this is a good summary of the WMF position today.
Jeff
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:06 AM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulosperneta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If I've well understood the timeline, all
input from the Wikimedia
community ceases in mid September. Then it's all defined by the WGs 8and
their advisors), and eventually decided upon by the BoT around December.
Therefore, after 15 September or so, the Wikimedia community will only be
dealing with those recommendations again when they are already in the
process of implementation.
It's quite easy to predict that things will not get pretty if the
Wikimedia
community does not approve some of the
recommendations that pass all the
way till implementation phase.
Paulo
Nicole Ebber <nicole.ebber(a)wikimedia.de> escreveu no dia quinta,
22/08/2019
à(s) 11:58:
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your engagement and input. It’s been great seeing so much
> attention on movement strategy and collaborative efforts for building
our
> future. Here are a couple of follow up
responses and clarifications.
>
> DRAFTS
> As pointed out in my previous email, the documents we recently shared
are
> recommendation drafts. They are not final,
and not complete, but
working
> documents that are currently being refined
by the working groups. Some
> answers still read like stubs that are longing for further development,
> others are very detailed and will become more focused over the next few
> weeks. We still decided to publish everything at once, to give
everyone a
> full picture of the variety of topics and
offer an insight into
multiple
> progress levels.
>
> I would also like to reiterate that movement values, priorities and
> community conversation processes are high on our radar. A
recommendation
to
> change the existing license model, for example, will not just go
through
a
quick approval process, but lead to a deeper
exploration into the
reasoning
> behind it: What problems are we trying to tackle, and what could be
ways
to
> mitigate them? Such recommendation would then rather suggest to look
into
> different measures to ensure indigenous
knowledge is included in the
> Wikimedia ecosystem, deploy research and further consultation, instead
of
rushing
to a quick fix.
INTEGRATION
The working groups are taking input that they gathered at Wikimania and
via
> different movement channels and incorporating it into the next
iteration
of
> their recommendations. These documents will then serve as a basis for
> harmonization across working groups.
>
> The input that we are gathering comes in on different levels. Some of
it
> targets structural level changes or
emphasizes specific principles or
> values, while other feedback is more on the programmatic side or
already
addressing implementation. Structural input will continue to be
considered
> in forthcoming iterations of the recommendations. Programmatic input
will
be
documented and taken forward to inform the implementation.
TIMELINE
We wanted to get the English drafts out as soon as possible and the
translations on a rolling basis, so that Wikimania participants could
read
and prepare to engage in person. Over the next
few weeks, we will do
targeted, public outreach to online project communities in multiple
languages. We are soliciting feedback to shape the overall direction of
the
> recommendations through mid-September. Working Groups are already
working
> on identifying gaps and overlaps with other
groups to prepare for
> harmonization.
>
> At the harmonization sprint in Tunis on 20-22 September, we will bring
3
representatives from each Working Group together to work to develop a
more
> coherent set of recommendations. The group will be supported by
> facilitators and external advice, as well as the core team. We have
also
> invited María Sefidari, Katherine Maher,
Ryan Merkley, Valerie D’Costa
> (Wikimedia Foundation) and Abraham Taherivand (Wikimedia Deutschland)
to
> the sprint. They contribute expertise and
experience from their work
and
> leadership in the movement and beyond. They
will be active listeners
and
can
challenge recommendations by pointing out risks and consequences on
the
> organizational and movement level. They also participate as the
> representatives of organizations that may be impacted by the
> recommendations. Involving them early is important so they can
anticipate
> any possible changes for their staff and
programs, and plan for
> implementation.
>
> Our aim is to release recommendations in November 2019, and present
them
to
> the Board of Trustees for approval in December. We will need the legal
> authority of the board for some of the recommendations, while others
will
then be
further delegated to other community mechanisms and structures
for
> approval or further consultation.[1] There will be additional public
> consultation activities around implementation that will be discussed
and
owned
across the movement.
WORKING GROUPS
We have chosen the working group model to ensure that the process that
embarks to make significant changes to our movement structures is owned
by
> the community. Members of the nine working group were selected by a
> steering committee and the groups were established in July 2019.[2]
Group
> members come from different parts of the
movement, e.g. from different
> regions and languages, from individual contributors and organized
groups,
> and with different volunteer and staff
roles, incl. Wikimedia
Foundation
> staff and board.
>
> The groups are doing an amazing job. With many of them being
volunteers,
or
doing this work on top of their regular jobs,
creating the draft
recommendations is a huge achievement. They first needed to form, storm
and
norm as a group and figure out how to best work
together across time
zones,
languages, and contexts. They then took a deep
dive into the substance
and
identified the scope of their work and the
specific questions to tackle
for
us as a movement to advance in our strategic
direction. The development
of
> recommendations has started in spring this year, and – aside from many
> online calls, asynchronous work and scarce in-person meetings –
included
> incorporating community conversations and
external expertise. It is
only
to
> the hard work of these groups that we finally have something tangible
in
front of
us that we can all react to and help further improve to build
our
> future together.
>
> Please join us in thanking, celebrating and supporting them, rather
than
rushing
to conclusions or arguing over details. Please contribute in
good
faith, and in a constructive way.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Best wishes,
Nicole
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/July…
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working…
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 13:13, Yaroslav Blanter <ymbalt(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> And this is the core problem of the whole process (which has been
pointed
> out by multiple people from the very
beginning)
>
> Cheers
> Yaroslav
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:27 PM Jeff Hawke <geoffey.hawke(a)gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:41 PM Andy Mabbett <
> andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 09:55, Jeff Hawke <
geoffey.hawke(a)gmail.com>
> >
wrote:
> > >
> > > > the WG then collate them and decide the final form of the
> > > > recommendations, to be implemented by the WMF
> > >
> > > This seems to be missing a rather crucial intermediate step; the
one
> >
where the recommendations are accepted, or not, by the wider
Wikimedia
> > community.
> >
>
> That step is not mentioned at
>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Frequen…
> >
?
> >
> > Jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Nicole Ebber
Adviser International Relations
Program Manager Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy
Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
https://wikimedia.de
Unsere Vision ist eine Welt, in der alle Menschen am Wissen der
Menschheit
teilhaben, es nutzen und mehren können. Helfen
Sie uns dabei!
https://spenden.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland — Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt
durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>